From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs: fix potential NULL pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:30:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180202163006.GA878@jcrouse-lnx.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180202123223.GA4410@embeddedor.com>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:32:23AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> _minor_ is being dereferenced before it is null checked, hence there
> is a potential null pointer dereference. Fix this by moving the pointer
> dereference after _minor_ has been null checked.
>
> Fixes: 024ad8df763f ("drm/msm: add a5xx specific debugfs")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>
> I wonder if a better solution for this would be to WARN_ON in case _minor_
> happens to be NULL and return -EINVAL, instead of just returning zero.
>
> Something like:
>
> struct drm_device *dev;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!minor)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> dev = minor->dev;
>
> What do you think?
In my opinion everything in debugfs is optional. I'm not sure if it is even
possible for dev->primary, dev->render or dev->control to be NULL from the DRM
core but if so I think the failure should be silent.
Jordan
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c
> index 6b27941..059ec7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c
> @@ -159,13 +159,15 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(reset_fops, NULL, reset_set, "%llx\n");
>
> int a5xx_debugfs_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct drm_minor *minor)
> {
> - struct drm_device *dev = minor->dev;
> + struct drm_device *dev;
> struct dentry *ent;
> int ret;
>
> if (!minor)
> return 0;
>
> + dev = minor->dev;
> +
> ret = drm_debugfs_create_files(a5xx_debugfs_list,
> ARRAY_SIZE(a5xx_debugfs_list),
> minor->debugfs_root, minor);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-02 12:32 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-02-02 16:30 ` Jordan Crouse [this message]
2018-02-02 19:04 ` Rob Clark
2018-02-03 12:22 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180202163006.GA878@jcrouse-lnx.qualcomm.com \
--to=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®