From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2267dXtmBvyb+7vxjmWTd1rYxJ/Je1QXKyTqADdZ9Idhao7XgG7PQ9pAB9XKFcWk5JX0wBq3 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517855085; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aCW5rPfgurj791PgQfWtZHAyZRkoMDaQ0LS08s9sj1AExga+IXMcf4OcmsQMUtZxm0 7vvuzhuK1MPoNIEF3TFNFl1UrnNe2FYPpkbFVqFNv4Y+UVgUxpU6/4CNleoOFmMW0gz+ lzJLmg0Flfo+hwHhd83erWvC4r6tUIABL+JbSQFMq6OUVES55Lmuqyh6QCuRyUaQKPKp OhMDKLU6M6qMH4nl3ebSTtHn2LwDWGJfuI1rF7yBpzdlqM9Ytrz4VetPAiuNYKCLxAgb V0S27y5ArkEtvq7DWTOcZslYmRqV+fjkiL/wBH/21jQ4MTEqijn+jcNIdok18wLNxFN/ e5OQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=HTA95mwAamUeHzjDOPQmMdQlqpnfRkGrVziTxailmJc=; b=YA/ABSH38ZKzhr/m5SKniBlx7AZOJc1B1P0M3Yr27sBtAu2xeJv7I+q37gTX2TcrMF E3Zalc3TIN+ER86Y0BOvXCd77/o2IEIoYqijc68VSQfpGTv+47aw9AXiVfTf5J+R0mun gKDBTLwr2ZIgIFufkK/pFWhUhA5gra7mwfX60ad06fSdDtTf99sgwwQCXuibEGN9Aq8d 8FhFy0HnpNn0BrRKSV2JB0yxrLKowvYDi7y8VP3s6T7N6uSMECHJlATISc/4DodHDv4u Y+wU1YvUAXF7m95wZkD56SHn6EevmkbK9vhPif23mzjWyA9JFwhPePX+3H2MGHnaDTVu gfkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning gregkh@linuxfoundation.org does not designate 104.132.1.108 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning gregkh@linuxfoundation.org does not designate 104.132.1.108 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Dan Williams , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Al Viro , alan@linux.intel.com Subject: [PATCH 4.14 42/64] x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:23:01 -0800 Message-Id: <20180205182140.302820196@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180205182138.571333346@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180205182138.571333346@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-LABELS: =?utf-8?b?IlxcU2VudCI=?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1591586413682850821?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1591586413682850821?= X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com commit 304ec1b050310548db33063e567123fae8fd0301 Quoting Linus: I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends, but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_ accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache. __uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Suggested-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++--- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 6 +++--- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 12 ++++++------ arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ do { \ ({ \ int __gu_err; \ __inttype(*(ptr)) __gu_val; \ - __uaccess_begin(); \ + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \ __get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \ __uaccess_end(); \ (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \ @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long bu * get_user_ex(...); * } get_user_catch(err) */ -#define get_user_try uaccess_try +#define get_user_try uaccess_try_nospec #define get_user_catch(err) uaccess_catch(err) #define get_user_ex(x, ptr) do { \ @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ extern void __cmpxchg_wrong_size(void) __typeof__(ptr) __uval = (uval); \ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (old); \ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __new = (new); \ - __uaccess_begin(); \ + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \ switch (size) { \ case 1: \ { \ --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h @@ -29,21 +29,21 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void switch (n) { case 1: ret = 0; - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u8 *)to, from, ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: ret = 0; - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u16 *)to, from, ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: ret = 0; - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u32 *)to, from, ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4); __uaccess_end(); --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h @@ -55,31 +55,31 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *dst, const void return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size); switch (size) { case 1: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u8 *)dst, (u8 __user *)src, ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u16 *)dst, (u16 __user *)src, ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u32 *)dst, (u32 __user *)src, ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 8: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src, ret, "q", "", "=r", 8); __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 10: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src, ret, "q", "", "=r", 10); if (likely(!ret)) @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 16: - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); __get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src, ret, "q", "", "=r", 16); if (likely(!ret)) --- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ do { \ unsigned long __copy_user_ll(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n)) __copy_user(to, from, n); else @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_ll); unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - __uaccess_begin(); + __uaccess_begin_nospec(); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY if (n > 64 && static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2)) n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n);