From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752622AbeBFQT7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:19:59 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:45440 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbeBFQTv (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:19:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:19:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20180206.111949.1986970583522698316.davem@davemloft.net> To: keescook@chromium.org Cc: syzbot+e2d6cfb305e9f3911dea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers3@gmail.com, james.morse@arm.com, keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae, labbott@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] socket: Provide put_cmsg_whitelist() for constant size copies From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20180202102749.GA34019@beast> <20180205.100347.176614123780866781.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kees Cook Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:31:50 +1100 > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:03 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Kees Cook >> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 02:27:49 -0800 >> >>> @@ -343,6 +343,14 @@ struct ucred { >>> >>> extern int move_addr_to_kernel(void __user *uaddr, int ulen, struct sockaddr_storage *kaddr); >>> extern int put_cmsg(struct msghdr*, int level, int type, int len, void *data); >>> +/* >>> + * Provide a bounce buffer for copying cmsg data to userspace when the >>> + * target memory isn't already whitelisted for hardened usercopy. >>> + */ >>> +#define put_cmsg_whitelist(_msg, _level, _type, _ptr) ({ \ >>> + typeof(*(_ptr)) _val = *(_ptr); \ >>> + put_cmsg(_msg, _level, _type, sizeof(_val), &_val); \ >>> + }) >> >> I understand what you are trying to achieve, but it's at a real cost >> here. Some of these objects are structures, for example the struct >> sock_extended_err is 16 bytes. > > It didn't look like put_cmsg() was on a fast path, so it seemed like a > bounce buffer was the best solution here (and it's not without > precedent). For some things like timestamps it can be important.