From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: A problem about 'perf sched latency'
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:57:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180208005724.GB24686@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206135002.sn32vfqgfz326rcb@intel.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:50:02PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am using perf sched tool to analyzer sched data on my machine. But it seems that
> 'perf sched latency' report incorrect 'Switches'. What I did is as below.
>
> First, record...
> $ sudo perf sched record time pi 2000000 > /dev/null
>
> Then check statistics. It says 'pi' only sched-in 1 time.
> $ sudo ./perf sched latency | grep pi
> compiz:4054 | 6.389 ms | 30 | avg: 0.023 ms | max: 0.122 ms | max at: 94546.021080 s
> pi:4059 | 2083.241 ms | 1 | avg: 0.007 ms | max: 0.007 ms | max at: 94545.201435 s
>
> But the sched event show 'pi' has been sched-in 7 times.
> $ sudo ./perf sched script | grep pi:
> pi 4059 [001] 94545.820858: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1:32237 [120]
> kworker/1:1 32237 [001] 94545.820868: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1:32237 [120] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94545.885412: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1H:320 [100]
> kworker/1:1H 320 [001] 94545.885419: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1H:320 [100] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94545.907869: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1H:320 [100]
> kworker/1:1H 320 [001] 94545.907875: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1H:320 [100] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94545.908104: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1H:320 [100]
> kworker/1:1H 320 [001] 94545.908108: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1H:320 [100] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94545.916135: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1H:320 [100]
> kworker/1:1H 320 [001] 94545.916154: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1H:320 [100] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94546.812856: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> kworker/1:1:32237 [120]
> kworker/1:1 32237 [001] 94546.813148: sched:sched_switch: kworker/1:1:32237 [120] R ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94546.885227: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] S ==> i915/signal:1:207 [98]
> i915/signal:1 207 [001] 94546.885232: sched:sched_switch: i915/signal:1:207 [98] D ==> pi:4059 [120]
> pi 4059 [001] 94547.285049: sched:sched_switch: pi:4059 [120] x ==> swapper/1:0 [120]
>
> Does anyone know why? Thank you! :)
It seems your data doesn't have wakeup event which is required by the
'perf sched latency'.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Changbin Du
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 13:50 Du, Changbin
2018-02-08 0:57 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2018-02-08 3:05 ` Du, Changbin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180208005724.GB24686@sejong \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®