mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mchehab@kernel.org, me@tobin.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 06:32:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209063231.349ad487@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87inb6a5rs.fsf@intel.com>

On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:09:27 +0200
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Feb 2018, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > XML escaping is a worry that came with DocBook, which we no longer have any
> > dealings with.  So get rid of the useless xml_escape()/xml_unescape()
> > functions.  No change to the generated output.  
> 
> I think this will break at least the -docbook output option, perhaps
> also -html and -html5 options. If you think it's okay to break them,
> would it not be better to just axe those off first?
> 
> I guess this boils down to, is kernel-doc the script a general purpose
> tool, or just a very specific part of the kernel documentation build
> process?
> 
> FWIW I think the latter, and why don't you throw docbook/html support
> out already!

See commit b05142675310 :)

Thanks,

jon

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-09 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:09   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 13:32     ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] docs: kernel-doc: Rename and split STATE_FIELD Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:20   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NORMAL processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:23   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NAME " Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:27   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_BODY processing to a separate function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:32   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 17:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-13 10:01       ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:33   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] docs: kernel-doc: Finish moving STATE_* code out of process_file() Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08  2:29   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-08 19:58     ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:36       ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08  2:30   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-09  9:47   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-14 16:53   ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-08  2:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-14 18:40 [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: Cleanup kernel-doc and fix literal block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-14 19:04   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180209063231.349ad487@lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome