From: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
To: Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: i2c: adv748x: Simplify regmap configuration
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:39:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209153915.GE7666@bigcity.dyn.berto.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518024886-842-2-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org>
Hi Kieran,
Thanks for your patch.
On 2018-02-07 17:34:45 +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>
> The ADV748x has identical map configurations for each register map. The
> duplication of each map can be simplified using a helper macro such that
> each map is represented on a single line.
>
> Define ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF for this purpose and un-define after it's
> use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c | 111 ++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c
> index fd92c9e4b519..71c69b816db2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c
> @@ -35,98 +35,31 @@
> * Register manipulation
> */
>
> -static const struct regmap_config adv748x_regmap_cnf[] = {
> - {
> - .name = "io",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "dpll",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "cp",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "hdmi",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "edid",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "repeater",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "infoframe",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "cec",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "sdp",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> -
> - {
> - .name = "txb",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> -
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> - {
> - .name = "txa",
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> +#define ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF(n) \
> +{ \
> + .name = n, \
> + .reg_bits = 8, \
> + .val_bits = 8, \
> + .max_register = 0xff, \
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, \
> +}
>
> - .max_register = 0xff,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> - },
> +static const struct regmap_config adv748x_regmap_cnf[] = {
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("io"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("dpll"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("cp"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("hdmi"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("edid"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("repeater"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("infoframe"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("cec"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("sdp"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("txa"),
> + ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF("txb"),
> };
>
> +#undef ADV748X_REGMAP_CONF
> +
Why is this macro undefined here? It have a rather limited scope as it's
only local to this C file and it have a good prefix of ADV748X_ so
conflicts are highly unlikely. Is there something I'm missing?
Is it really customary to undefine helper macros like this once they are
used to populate the structure?
> static int adv748x_configure_regmap(struct adv748x_state *state, int region)
> {
> int err;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1518024886-842-1-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org>
2018-02-07 17:34 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-09 15:39 ` Niklas Söderlund [this message]
2018-02-09 15:43 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-07 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: adv748x: Add missing CBUS page Kieran Bingham
2018-02-09 15:41 ` Niklas Söderlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180209153915.GE7666@bigcity.dyn.berto.se \
--to=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®