mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ckadabi@codeaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jnair@caviumnetworks.com, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/22] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata workarounds
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:25:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209182522.GI5862@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180209175513.17100-22-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:54:51PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Now that the features and errata workarounds have the same
> rules and flow, group the handling of the tables.
> 
> Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

The naming gets a bit confusing, particularly with
setup_system_capabilities() which enables for SCOPE_ALL, but I can't
think of an obviously better name.

Otherwise the refactoring looks sensible, so FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 45bac0c4ae91..9b111d560b30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -504,8 +504,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
>  }
>  
>  extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[];
> -static void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
> -				    u16 scope_mask, const char *info);
> +static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask);
>  
>  void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
>  {
> @@ -554,10 +553,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
>  	 * Run the errata work around and local feature checks on the
>  	 * boot CPU, once we have initialised the cpu feature infrastructure.
>  	 */
> -	update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU,
> -				"enabling workaround for");
> -	update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU,
> -				"detected feature:");
> +	update_cpu_capabilities(SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);
>  }
>  
>  static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg, u64 new)
> @@ -1225,7 +1221,7 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
> +static void __update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
>  				    u16 scope_mask, const char *info)
>  {
>  	scope_mask &= ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_MASK;
> @@ -1240,6 +1236,14 @@ static void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
> +{
> +	__update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, scope_mask,
> +				  "detected feature:");
> +	__update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, scope_mask,
> +				  "enabling workaround for");
> +}
> +
>  static int __enable_cpu_capability(void *arg)
>  {
>  	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap = arg;
> @@ -1253,7 +1257,7 @@ static int __enable_cpu_capability(void *arg)
>   * CPUs
>   */
>  static void __init
> -enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps, u16 scope_mask)
> +__enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps, u16 scope_mask)
>  {
>  	scope_mask &= ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_MASK;
>  	for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
> @@ -1277,6 +1281,12 @@ enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps, u16 scope_mas
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
> +{
> +	__enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, scope_mask);
> +	__enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, scope_mask);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
>   * If the system has already detected a capability, take necessary
> @@ -1332,6 +1342,12 @@ static bool __verify_local_cpu_caps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_li
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool verify_local_cpu_caps(u16 scope_mask)
> +{
> +	return __verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_errata, scope_mask) &&
> +	       __verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_features, scope_mask);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Check for CPU features that are used in early boot
>   * based on the Boot CPU value.
> @@ -1371,7 +1387,6 @@ static void verify_sve_features(void)
>  	/* Add checks on other ZCR bits here if necessary */
>  }
>  
> -
>  /*
>   * Run through the enabled system capabilities and enable() it on this CPU.
>   * The capabilities were decided based on the available CPUs at the boot time.
> @@ -1382,15 +1397,9 @@ static void verify_sve_features(void)
>   */
>  static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * The CPU Errata work arounds are detected and applied at boot time
> -	 * and the related information is freed soon after. If the new CPU
> -	 * requires an errata not detected at boot, fail this CPU.
> -	 */
> -	if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_errata, SCOPE_ALL))
> -		cpu_die_early();
> -	if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_features, SCOPE_ALL))
> +	if (!verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_ALL))
>  		cpu_die_early();
> +
>  	verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
>  
>  	if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
> @@ -1417,14 +1426,10 @@ void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
>  	 * Otherwise, this CPU should verify that it has all the system
>  	 * advertised capabilities.
>  	 */
> -	if (!sys_caps_initialised) {
> -		update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU,
> -					"enabling workaround for");
> -		update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU,
> -					"detected feature:");
> -	} else {
> +	if (!sys_caps_initialised)
> +		update_cpu_capabilities(SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);
> +	else
>  		verify_local_cpu_capabilities();
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_const_caps_ready);
> @@ -1443,18 +1448,23 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap)
>  		__this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_errata, cap));
>  }
>  
> +static void __init setup_system_capabilities(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We have finalised the system-wide safe feature
> +	 * registers, finalise the capabilities that depend
> +	 * on it. Also enable all the available capabilities.
> +	 */
> +	update_cpu_capabilities(SCOPE_SYSTEM);
> +	enable_cpu_capabilities(SCOPE_ALL);
> +}
> +
>  void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
>  {
>  	u32 cwg;
>  	int cls;
>  
> -	/* Set the CPU feature capabilies */
> -	update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, SCOPE_SYSTEM,
> -				"detected feature:");
> -	update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, SCOPE_SYSTEM,
> -				"enabling workaround for");
> -	enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, SCOPE_ALL);
> -	enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, SCOPE_ALL);
> +	setup_system_capabilities();
>  	mark_const_caps_ready();
>  	setup_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
>  
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-09 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-09 17:54 [PATCH v3 00/21] arm64: Rework cpu capabilities handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] arm64: capabilities: Move errata work around check on boot CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] arm64: capabilities: Update prototype for enable call back Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] arm64: capabilities: Move errata processing code Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] arm64: capabilities: Move errata work around check on boot CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] arm64: capabilities: Move errata processing code Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for fine grained capabilities Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] arm64: capabilities: Add flags to handle the conflicts on late CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for fine grained capabilities Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] arm64: capabilities: Add flags to handle the conflicts on late CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] arm64: capabilities: Filter the entries based on a given mask Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] arm64: capabilities: Filter the entries based on a given mask Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for grouping features and errata work arounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:11   ` Dave Martin
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] arm64: capabilities: Split the processing of " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: capabilities: Allow features based on local CPU scope Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] arm64: capabilities: Split the processing of errata work arounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:18   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-08 12:24     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] arm64: capabilities: Allow features based on local CPU scope Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:22   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-08 12:14     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata workarounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:25   ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] arm64: capabilities: Introduce weak features based on local CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] arm64: capabilities: Restrict KPTI detection to boot-time CPUs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] arm64: capabilities: Add support for features enabled early Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] arm64: capabilities: Restrict KPTI detection to boot-time CPUs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] arm64: capabilities: Add support for features enabled early Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-12 17:17   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-07 17:42     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] arm64: capabilities: Change scope of VHE to Boot CPU feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-12 17:17   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-08 12:10     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-03-08 13:43       ` Dave Martin
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] arm64: capabilities: Clean up midr range helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: Add helpers for checking CPU MIDR against a range Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] arm64: capabilities: Clean up midr range helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] arm64: Add helpers for checking CPU MIDR against a range Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] arm64: capabilities: Add support for checks based on a list of MIDRs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] arm64: capabilities: Handle shared entries Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] arm64: Add MIDR encoding for Arm Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] arm64: capabilities: Handle shared entries Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-12 17:17   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-08 12:16     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] arm64: Add MIDR encoding for Arm Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] arm64: Delay enabling hardware DBM feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] arm64: Delay enabling hardware DBM feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:58   ` Dave Martin
2018-03-07 17:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-03-08 13:53       ` Dave Martin
2018-03-08 13:55         ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-09 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] arm64: Rework cpu capabilities handling Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180209182522.GI5862@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ckadabi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jnair@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome