From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] objtool: Add module specific retpoline rules
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212130732.GL25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518440480.6606.62.camel@infradead.org>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:01:20PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 13:48 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > David wanted to not use retpolines in .init.text but that will trip up
> > objtool retpoline validation, fix that.
>
> I wanted, I got. This is upstream already (66f793099a63) so this commit
> message possibly wants tweaking slightly.
Right you are, I should have re-read these Changelogs before posting ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 12:48 [PATCH v2 0/8] objtool: retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] objtool: Use existing global variables for options Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] objtool: Add module specific retpoline rules Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 13:01 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] objtool: Retpoline validation tweaks Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] x86,nospec: Annotate indirect calls/jumps Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/paravirt: Annotate indirect calls Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86: Annotate indirect jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86,sme: Annotate indirect call Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212130732.GL25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®