From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate due to a sync wakeup on exit
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212173147.GZ25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180212145857.8056-5-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:58:57PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 28c8d9c91955..50442697b455 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5710,8 +5710,14 @@ wake_affine_idle(int this_cpu, int prev_cpu, int sync)
> if (idle_cpu(this_cpu) && cpus_share_cache(this_cpu, prev_cpu))
> return idle_cpu(prev_cpu) ? prev_cpu : this_cpu;
>
> - if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1)
> + if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1) {
> + /* Avoid tasks exiting pulling parents to new nodes */
> + if ((current->flags & PF_EXITING) &&
> + !cpus_share_cache(this_cpu, prev_cpu))
> + return prev_cpu;
> +
Cute, but should we not kill @sync right at the source in this case?
Something a little like this?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5eb3ffc9be84..568ea4ce5b36 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6342,7 +6342,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
- int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ int sync = (wake_flags & WF_SYNC) && !(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
record_wakee(p);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 14:58 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce migrations due to load imbalance and process exits Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Avoid an unnecessary lookup of current CPU ID during wake_affine Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Defer calculation of prev_eff_load in wake_affine until needed Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate on wake_affine_weight if weights are equal Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 17:43 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 19:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-02-12 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 20:20 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate due to a sync wakeup on exit Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-12 17:47 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 18:01 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-12 20:01 ` Andreas Mohr
2018-02-12 20:09 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212173147.GZ25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®