mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
To: Enrico Weigelt <lkml@metux.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: plan9 semantics on Linux - mount namespaces
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:27:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180213222751.p3fyg7whg6jqlzz5@gordon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5633d335-3926-d98f-d6d7-948b1e2a0b2c@metux.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]

On 2018-02-13, Enrico Weigelt <lkml@metux.net> wrote:
> On 13.02.2018 22:12, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > I'm currently trying to implement plan9 semantics on Linux and
> > yet sorting out how to do the mount namespace handling.
> > 
> > On plan9, any unprivileged process can create its own namespace
> > and mount/bind at will, while on Linux this requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
> > 
> > What is the reason for not allowing arbitrary users to create their
> > own private mount namespace ? What could go wrong here ?

You can do this by creating a new user namespace (CLONE_NEWUSER), which
then gives you the required permissions to create other namespaces
(CLONE_NEWNS). This is how "rootless containers" or unprivileged
containers operate.

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-13 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-13 22:12 Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-13 22:19 ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-13 22:27   ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2018-02-14  0:01     ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14  4:54       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-02-14 10:18         ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 10:24           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-02-14 11:27             ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 11:30               ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 12:38                 ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 12:53                   ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 14:03                     ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 14:19                       ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 15:02                         ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 15:17                           ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 17:21                             ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 17:50                               ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 18:01                                 ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 18:12                                   ` Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 18:32                                     ` Enrico Weigelt
2018-02-14 20:39                               ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-02-16 18:26   ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180213222751.p3fyg7whg6jqlzz5@gordon \
    --to=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@metux.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®