From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1161135AbeBNRWG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:22:06 -0500
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:56074 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1033384AbeBNRWE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:22:04 -0500
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:22:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20180214.122202.330947258009140771.davem@davemloft.net>
To: andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: hau@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nic_swsd@realtek.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next] r8169: add module param for control of
 ASPM disable.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180214134040.GB22014@lunn.ch>
References: <1518598965-3593-1-git-send-email-hau@realtek.com>
        <20180214134040.GB22014@lunn.ch>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:40:40 +0100

> linux/drivers$ grep -ir aspm * | grep MODULE_
> gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "ASPM support (1 = enable, 0 = disable, -1 = auto)");
> gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "ASPM support (1 = enable, 0 = disable, -1 = auto)");
> infiniband/hw/hfi1/pcie.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "PCIe ASPM: 0: disable, 1: enable, 2: dynamic");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723be/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> staging/rts5208/rtsx.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm_l0s_l1_en, "enable device aspm");
> staging/rtlwifi/rtl8822be/sw.c:MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm, "Set to 1 to enable ASPM (default 1)\n");
> 
> This patch seems to have the exact opposite of everybody else already
> does.
> 
> Maybe you can follow the AMD example, and default to -1, since you are
> proposing to mostly have it enabled, but disabled in one case?

This is just another good reminder of why module parameters are a
terrible user experience for just about anything device configuration
related.

"Let's add knob X using a module parameter!"

Then a dozen or so other drivers copy the same thing with subtly, or
not so subtly, different behaviors, defaults, and semantics.

For users, this leads to misery.