From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: cpumap: use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in __cpu_map_entry_alloc()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:58:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180214175838.GA7275@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214183451.25252d72@redhat.com>
On Wed 14-02-18 18:34:51, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:06:40 +0100
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed 14-02-18 22:17:34, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > There're several implications after commit 0bf7800f1799 ("ptr_ring:
> > > try vmalloc() when kmalloc() fails") with the using of vmalloc() since
> > > can't allow GFP_ATOMIC but mandate GFP_KERNEL. This will lead a WARN
> > > since cpumap try to call with GFP_ATOMIC. Fortunately, entry
> > > allocation of cpumap can only be done through syscall path which means
> > > GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, so fixing this by replacing GFP_ATOMIC
> > > with GFP_KERNEL.
> >
> > map_update_elem does the following. Unless I am missing something and
> > the callback doesn't call cpu_map_update_elem there then we are in a
> > non-preemptible context there and GFP_WAIT would blow up.
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > err = map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, attr->flags);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
>
> Nope - you did miss something ;-)
>
> You are looking at the wrong place. Look at /kernel/bpf/syscall.c line 697.
>
> vim +697 kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> [...]
> } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP) {
> err = map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, attr->flags);
> goto out;
> }
>
> You missed that map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP is special cased, and
> is moved outside rcu_read_{lock,unlock} (because it need to create some
> kthreads).
>
> Further more the BPF-verifier disallow BPF programs runtime changing
> the BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP. Right now, we disallow almost everything from
> the bpf-side (even reading the value):
>
> vim +2057 kernel/bpf/verifier.c
OK, thanks for the clarification. I am not familiar with the code at all
so I was merely looking at call sites and this one just hit my eyes.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 14:17 Jason Wang
2018-02-14 14:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-14 14:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-14 15:06 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-14 17:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-14 17:58 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-02-14 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-02-14 17:45 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180214175838.GA7275@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®