From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:51:25 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/108] 4.4.116-stable review Message-ID: <20180216065125.GB26224@kroah.com> References: <20180215151222.267507937@linuxfoundation.org> <20180216024508.GA18379@flashbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180216024508.GA18379@flashbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:45:08PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:15:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.116 release. > > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Feb 17 15:11:36 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.116-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5. > > The v4l2-ioctl32 commits were interesting to sift through merging... I > think I got everything correct though, the changes are in my trees under > temporary tags if anyone cares to check them out: > > https://github.com/nathanchance/wahoo/commits/queue-2.17 > https://github.com/nathanchance/op5/commits/queue-3.10 Thanks for that, yes, those are going to be an "interesting" merge :( > So far, there have been no visible regressions in dmesg or general > usage (I focused pretty heavily in the video area since those were the > biggest changes). thanks for testing and letting us know. greg k-h