From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752658AbeBSLtr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:49:47 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57976 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752389AbeBSLtq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:49:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:49:30 +0000 From: Morten Rasmussen To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Morten Rasmussen , mingo@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched: Add static_key for asymmetric cpu capacity optimizations Message-ID: <20180219114930.GA4589@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1518711654-23503-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com> <1518711654-23503-2-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com> <20180216134704.GE25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180216154101.GE28799@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20180216165123.GH25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180216165123.GH25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 05:51:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:41:01PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > ? possibly with: > > > > > > else > > > static_branch_disable(&sched_asym_cpucapacity); > > > > > > if you want to play funny games :-) > > > > I thought about that too. It could make certain hotplug scenarios even > > more expensive. I think we want the sched_asym_cpucapacity code to behave > > even if SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY isn't set anywhere, so the static key would > > be permanently from the point we detect asymmetry and leave it set. This > > would be in line with how the smt static key works. > > Fair enough.. Yeah, we can always add the 'else' bit later if we find a good reason to do so.