From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751405AbeBTIhg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:37:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:51269 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750979AbeBTIhf (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:37:35 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225h/YNgssW8CMmtkUWWsjgLzwke2ij2eL1pXujcTCTc1ACjKNUCZ/+FSdyKHvb/6zm4qrH/+A== Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:37:31 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jan Beulich Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check Message-ID: <20180220083731.kzkctvwvtc4qhrdi@gmail.com> References: <5A8BDF3602000078001A96CD@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20180220081042.wgriecqneizg3df7@gmail.com> <5A8BE8C602000078001A9729@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A8BE8C602000078001A9729@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jan Beulich wrote: > I'll see what I can do; it's a pity that the change here, which had > been sent weeks ago and is a bug fix, hadn't gone in before that > other change (being more an improvement than a bug fix). When was it submitted, got a link or Message-ID of the previous submission? Thanks, Ingo