mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: make sure struct filename->iname is word-aligned
Date: Thu,  1 Mar 2018 00:19:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228231922.15796-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)

I noticed that offsetof(struct filename, iname) is actually 28 on 64
bit platforms, so we always pass an unaligned pointer to
strncpy_from_user. This is mostly a problem for those 64 bit platforms
without HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, but even on x86_64, unaligned
accesses carry a penalty.

A user-space microbenchmark doing nothing but strncpy_from_user from the
same (aligned) source string runs about 5% faster when the destination
is aligned. That number increases to 20% when the string is long
enough (~32 bytes) that we cross a cache line boundary - that's for
example the case for about half the files a "git status" in a kernel
tree ends up stat'ing.

This won't make any real-life workloads 5%, or even 1%, faster, but path
lookup is common enough that cutting even a few cycles should be
worthwhile. So ensure we always pass an aligned destination pointer to
strncpy_from_user. Instead of explicit padding, simply swap the refcnt
and aname members, as suggested by Al Viro.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
 fs/namei.c         | 2 ++
 include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 921ae32dbc80..5a66e7ca5d60 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/init_task.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/build_bug.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "mount.h"
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ getname_flags(const char __user *filename, int flags, int *empty)
 	struct filename *result;
 	char *kname;
 	int len;
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct filename, iname) % sizeof(long) != 0);
 
 	result = audit_reusename(filename);
 	if (result)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 2a815560fda0..d7b2caadb292 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2380,8 +2380,8 @@ struct audit_names;
 struct filename {
 	const char		*name;	/* pointer to actual string */
 	const __user char	*uptr;	/* original userland pointer */
-	struct audit_names	*aname;
 	int			refcnt;
+	struct audit_names	*aname;
 	const char		iname[];
 };
 
-- 
2.15.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 23:19 Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2018-03-18 21:32 ` Rasmus Villemoes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180228231922.15796-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®