From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934291AbeCEKpL (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:45:11 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:37070 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933936AbeCEKpE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:45:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:44:46 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , Paul McKenney , Thomas Ilsche , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel , Aubrey Li , Mike Galbraith , LKML , Linux PM Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/7] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Message-ID: <20180305104446.GN25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1657351.s4RTvEoqBQ@aspire.rjw.lan> <46071692.o1R0bjyNQV@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46071692.o1R0bjyNQV@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 11:24:00PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > +/** > + * tick_nohz_idle_prepare - prepare for entering idle on the current CPU. > + * > + * Called when we start the idle loop. > + */ > +void tick_nohz_idle_prepare(void) > +{ > + __tick_nohz_idle_prepare(); > + > + local_irq_enable(); > +} I really dislike the asymmetry in IRQ state you introduced here. __tick_nohz_idle_prepare() disables IRQs. Must we do that?