From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932112AbeCEUmO (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:42:14 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:24160 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779AbeCEUmM (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:42:12 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,428,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="205690771" Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:42:12 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Sagi Grimberg , Oliver , Jens Axboe , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bjorn Helgaas , Max Gurtovoy , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] nvme-pci: Use PCI p2pmem subsystem to manage the CMB Message-ID: <20180305204212.GD30975@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180228234006.21093-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20180228234006.21093-8-logang@deltatee.com> <20180305160004.GA30975@localhost.localdomain> <36c78987-006a-a97f-1d18-b0a08cbea9d4@grimberg.me> <20180305201053.GK11337@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180305201053.GK11337@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:10:53PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > So when reading the above mlx code, we see the first wmb() being used > to ensure that CPU stores to cachable memory are visible to the DMA > triggered by the doorbell ring. IIUC, we don't need a similar barrier for NVMe to ensure memory is visibile to DMA since the SQE memory is allocated DMA coherent when the SQ is not within a CMB. > The mmiowb() is used to ensure that DB writes are not combined and not > issued in any order other than implied by the lock that encloses the > whole thing. This is needed because uar_map is WC memory. > > We don't have ordering with respect to two writel's here, so if ARM > performance was a concern the writel could be switched to > writel_relaxed(). > > Presumably nvme has similar requirments, although I guess the DB > register is mapped UC not WC? Yep, the NVMe DB register is required by the spec to be mapped UC.