From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvE1kzLwqsReFFp1bSRdfEEG215ZPSh4oT3EeDvKfyYSekBYarUgPSPLz+Tiz6+ijFKVXdw ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1520447113; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yI+CbuRD/jHCyCwSQeuQthiC7O7oXfcYesRK37xUP6Q/85WbzG3WmqTlSrHUNThvK4 ZtyAB01GjK1p8252wKSqXyD+moTBclXu7C2fM2XKhRhcJORyhzR7SP/X3D15d+hSD5O+ GN2jlnGYN4jM1tVoKkX6qUyWEPCM9dwhFUPOH6r8Zhh4pLc5I89aJRQOAqgx7Jq+NzdJ ZGX0cs5Di7xGYQeeabo7BfB51vASRzegtsK6p6cU6ihRtoqk6Ss35tJnXJiawcSaaPGr QDMid3EaCXYDu3SWsueLKstWqntMNIZ1hRgKYIeTZeoO+lq67zGzhCYT0r071c37pjDR WVaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=+gVag2KEcIJRcmasNa+e6CjyytLFmmPEx5hVX/YBPJ0=; b=mLOPVYsaAEXkozPKpH0y3q13nzIzv92qOdbmkVINkVshpPUbVHSbFLp4y7JIUYUTUR NxtvyDge+dt1MuM3RscLTFQIq5CF6RA+FMOqOD+7ttABuJs/1uPXjEThNCclLMTfWyaP qEY4mT8Baq+26j1gZg1ksQqIELcEX1UWHksKybuz4GeCE3EN20VDz7QPa653sMwM1E3W khncH2NuqYGG13FjFVulUVuNpYf+z5laFJ7nMt8tL2esjzZlHXlorInRyuz4qUlyjr7a XoF8ozmiB7eJ6T7LGD/j6BY0jPGX45oDd75PtwvUqADYbhUnBh1odZ2ThtgR7clmDJja je/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933827AbeCGSZD (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:25:03 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:55276 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933655AbeCGSZC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:25:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 13:25:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20180307.132500.40232199631094354.davem@davemloft.net> To: anders.roxell@linaro.org Cc: shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20180306151004.31336-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> References: <20180306151004.31336-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1594201505777703046?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1594304352462937730?= X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Anders Roxell Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100 > The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The > test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a > pass. > > Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id") > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell I don't know about this. The test did not pass. So it should not be "skipped with a pass". We were unable to run it at all, which means we don't know if it would pass or fail. This means there is a third state besides pass or fail which we must acknowledge and implement.