mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rcu: exp: Protect all sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() with rcu_node lock
Date: Thu,  8 Mar 2018 16:48:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180308084831.29674-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)

Currently some callsites of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() are not called
with the corresponding rcu_node's ->lock held, which could introduces
bugs as per Paul:

o	CPU 0 in sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() reads ->exp_tasks and
	sees that it is NULL.

o	CPU 1 blocks within an RCU read-side critical section, so
	it enqueues the task and points ->exp_tasks at it and
	clears CPU 1's bit in ->expmask.

o	All other CPUs clear their bits in ->expmask.

o	CPU 0 reads ->expmask, sees that it is zero, so incorrectly
	concludes that all quiescent states have completed, despite
	the fact that ->exp_tasks is non-NULL.

To fix this, sync_rcu_preempt_exp_unlocked() is introduced to replace
lockless callsites of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done().

Further, a lockdep annotation is added into sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done()
to prevent mis-use in the future.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
v1 --> v2:
	Kill unnecessary blank lines


 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 2fd882b08b7c..3f30cc3b7669 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
  * Authors: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+
 /*
  * Record the start of an expedited grace period.
  */
@@ -158,10 +160,30 @@ static void __maybe_unused sync_exp_reset_tree(struct rcu_state *rsp)
  */
 static bool sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
+
 	return rnp->exp_tasks == NULL &&
 	       READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) == 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Like sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(), but this function assumes the caller
+ * doesn't hold the rcu_node's ->lock, and will acquire and release the lock
+ * itself
+ */
+static bool sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+	ret = sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+
 /*
  * Report the exit from RCU read-side critical section for the last task
  * that queued itself during or before the current expedited preemptible-RCU
@@ -498,9 +520,9 @@ static void synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	for (;;) {
 		ret = swait_event_timeout(
 				rsp->expedited_wq,
-				sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root),
+				sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp_root),
 				jiffies_stall);
-		if (ret > 0 || sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root))
+		if (ret > 0 || sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp_root))
 			return;
 		WARN_ON(ret < 0);  /* workqueues should not be signaled. */
 		if (rcu_cpu_stall_suppress)
@@ -533,7 +555,7 @@ static void synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 			rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
 				if (rnp == rnp_root)
 					continue; /* printed unconditionally */
-				if (sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp))
+				if (sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp))
 					continue;
 				pr_cont(" l=%u:%d-%d:%#lx/%c",
 					rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
-- 
2.16.2

             reply	other threads:[~2018-03-08  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-08  8:48 Boqun Feng [this message]
2018-03-08 17:37 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180308084831.29674-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome