From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932545AbeCLUx6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:53:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48334 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932326AbeCLUx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:53:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:53:55 +0000 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Waiman Long Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test Message-ID: <20180312205355.GC4449@wotan.suse.de> References: <1520885744-1546-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1520885744-1546-7-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1520885744-1546-7-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:15:44PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Add a range clamping test for the msgmni sysctl parameter to verify No! We don't want to test production values, please add a new test entry which is similar but does *not* modify system production values! Luis