From: ning.a.zhang@intel.com
To: dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alexander.levin@verizon.com, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
pombredanne@nexb.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Ning <ning.a.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] init: no need to wait device probe
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:55:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180319025508.3767-1-ning.a.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
From: Zhang Ning <ning.a.zhang@intel.com>
there are 2 reasons for no need to wait device probe
reason 1:
mount root device is very late in kernel initial stage.
all initcalls are finished. that means most of probe functions
are returned.
and deferred probe are also finished by late_initcall.
only async probe driver are possible in probing.
no block devices, device-mapper or nfs are use async probe.
so no need to wait device probe.
reason 2:
let's check dd.c, probe_count is increased and decreased only
in really_probe, and when really_probe returns, probe_count
always be 0.
when someone really wants to wait device-B probe.
but code looks like:
thread-1: thread-2:
probe device-A; wait_for_device_probe();
msleep(30);
probe device-B
when device-A probe finishes, thread-2 will be wakeup,
but device-B is not probed.
wait_for_device_probe can't make sure the device you want is probed.
based on above 2 reasons, no need to wait for device probe.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Ning <ning.a.zhang@intel.com>
---
init/do_mounts.c | 9 ---------
init/do_mounts_md.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
index 7cf4f6dafd5f..a9fb2ad44964 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c
@@ -555,15 +555,6 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
ssleep(root_delay);
}
- /*
- * wait for the known devices to complete their probing
- *
- * Note: this is a potential source of long boot delays.
- * For example, it is not atypical to wait 5 seconds here
- * for the touchpad of a laptop to initialize.
- */
- wait_for_device_probe();
-
md_run_setup();
if (saved_root_name[0]) {
diff --git a/init/do_mounts_md.c b/init/do_mounts_md.c
index 3f733c760a8c..4aab3492e71d 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts_md.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts_md.c
@@ -292,8 +292,6 @@ static void __init autodetect_raid(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "md: Waiting for all devices to be available before autodetect\n");
printk(KERN_INFO "md: If you don't use raid, use raid=noautodetect\n");
- wait_for_device_probe();
-
fd = sys_open("/dev/md0", 0, 0);
if (fd >= 0) {
sys_ioctl(fd, RAID_AUTORUN, raid_autopart);
--
2.14.2
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 2:55 ning.a.zhang [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-15 7:20 ning.a.zhang
2018-03-17 19:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-03-19 1:48 ` Zhang, Ning A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180319025508.3767-1-ning.a.zhang@intel.com \
--to=ning.a.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome