From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755533AbeCSNYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:24:36 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:35320 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753151AbeCSNYc (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:24:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:24:26 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Antoine Tenart Cc: Stefan Chulski , Russell King - ARM Linux , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kishon@ti.com" , "gregory.clement@bootlin.com" , "jason@lakedaemon.net" , "sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" , "maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com" , "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" , Nadav Haklai , Yan Markman , "mw@semihalf.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: phy: phylink: allow 10GKR interface to use in-band negotiation Message-ID: <20180319132426.GB26039@lunn.ch> References: <20180316103351.16616-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180316103351.16616-3-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180316155307.GQ9418@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20180319085252.GF4519@kwain> <20180319111205.GB2743@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20180319125227.GI4519@kwain> <20180319125953.GD19795@lunn.ch> <54e290a192734831b5db22191f056a81@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com> <20180319130823.GA22306@lunn.ch> <20180319131343.GK4519@kwain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180319131343.GK4519@kwain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This would definitively work for SFP connectors with a PHY, but would > that work when using direct attached cable? Then you need to know what is on the other end of the cable? A switch? A PHY? and SFP module? Andrew