mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
Cc: kishon@ti.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Niklas Cassel <niklass@axis.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI endpoint 64-bit BAR fixes
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:52:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180319165234.GA12486@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180308133331.19464-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> PCI endpoint fixes to improve the way 64-bit BARs are handled.
> 
> 
> There are still future improvements that could be made:
> 
> pci-epf-test.c always allocates space for
> 6 BARs, even when using 64-bit BARs (which
> really only requires us to allocate 3 BARs).
> 
> pcitest.sh will print "NOT OKAY" for BAR1,
> BAR3, and BAR5 when using 64-bit BARs.
> This could probably be improved to say
> something like "N/A (64-bit BAR)".
> 
> Niklas Cassel (5):
>   PCI: endpoint: BAR width should not depend on sizeof dma_addr_t
>   PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_set_bar() handle 64-bit BARs
>     properly
>   PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar() handle 64-bit BARs
>     properly
>   PCI: endpoint: Make pci_epc_set_bar() return the BAR width that was
>     set-up
>   misc: pci_endpoint_test: Handle 64-bit BARs properly
> 
>  drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c              | 12 +++++++-----
>  drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c          | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Niklas,

I am fine with the series but I'd need Kishon ACKs (and Greg's for the
last patch), I am ready to queue them then.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-19 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-08 13:33 Niklas Cassel
2018-03-08 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: endpoint: BAR width should not depend on sizeof dma_addr_t Niklas Cassel
2018-03-16 18:02   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-17  0:55     ` Niklas Cassel
2018-03-19 12:36       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-21  5:29   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-08 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_set_bar() handle 64-bit BARs properly Niklas Cassel
2018-03-21  5:49   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-08 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar() " Niklas Cassel
2018-03-21  5:54   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-08 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Make pci_epc_set_bar() return the BAR width that was set-up Niklas Cassel
2018-03-21  6:06   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-08 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Handle 64-bit BARs properly Niklas Cassel
2018-03-15 13:22   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-16 12:55     ` Niklas Cassel
2018-03-21  3:59   ` Niklas Cassel
2018-03-21  9:22     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-21  5:55   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-19 16:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2018-03-21  4:10   ` [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI endpoint 64-bit BAR fixes Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180319165234.GA12486@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
    --cc=niklass@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®