From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751995AbeCVXad (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:30:33 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54504 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751666AbeCVXac (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:30:32 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,347,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="40425298" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:30:29 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Alison Schofield Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Luck@alison-desk.jf.intel.com, Tim Chen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , David Rientjes , Igor Mammedov , Prarit Bhargava , brice.goglin@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,sched: allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an LLC Message-ID: <20180322233027.bh6dp5vdcb4rdvqe@agluck-desk> References: <20180322204922.GA2337@alison-desk.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180322204922.GA2337@alison-desk.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 01:49:22PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > + if (!topology_same_node(c, o) && > + (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && > + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X)) { Maybe make life easier in the future to add more models to the list by using x86_match_cpu() here? -Tony