From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824AbeCZImt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:42:49 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:51826 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbeCZIms (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:42:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:42:42 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Abderrahmane Benbachir , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] init, tracing: Add initcall trace events Message-ID: <20180326084242.GJ4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180323150241.878778199@goodmis.org> <20180323125016.270ea1558fe2499b1a12bfd7@linux-foundation.org> <20180323160441.3217664d@vmware.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180323160441.3217664d@vmware.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:04:41PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I would even argue that we remove the printks and use the trace events > instead. There's already an option to make trace events be sent to > printk(). I could have initcall_debug enable the trace events and send > them to printk. Those printk()'s are so ever much more useful when you fail to boot and can't get the trace buffer out.