From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752096AbeCZWTL (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:19:11 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:31002 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751160AbeCZWTK (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:19:10 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,365,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="38328288" Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:19:48 -0700 From: Alison Schofield To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Luck@alison-desk.jf.intel.com, Tim Chen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , David Rientjes , Igor Mammedov , Prarit Bhargava , brice.goglin@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,sched: allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an LLC Message-ID: <20180326221948.GA17814@alison-desk.jf.intel.com> References: <20180322204922.GA2337@alison-desk.jf.intel.com> <20180322233027.bh6dp5vdcb4rdvqe@agluck-desk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180322233027.bh6dp5vdcb4rdvqe@agluck-desk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 04:30:29PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 01:49:22PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > > + if (!topology_same_node(c, o) && > > + (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && > > + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X)) { > > Maybe make life easier in the future to add more models > to the list by using x86_match_cpu() here? > > -Tony Tony - Am I on the right track below? Define like this: static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id snc_cpu[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X }, {} }; Use like this: if (!topology_same_node(c, o) && x86_match_cpu(snc_cpu)) { Thanks, alisons