mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
To: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3][RESEND] modsign enhancement
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:11:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327221137.d7fhboicw2wi3a52@redbean> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521860389-19262-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>

+++ Jia Zhang [24/03/18 10:59 +0800]:
>This patch series allows to disable module validity enforcement
>in runtime through the control switch located in securityfs.
>
>In order to keep /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce simple,
>the disablement switch is located at
>/sys/kernel/security/modsign/disable_enforce.
>
>Assuming CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE=n, here are the instructions to
>test this control switch.
>
># cat /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce
>N
># echo 1 > /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce
># cat /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce
>Y
># echo -n 0 > no_sig_enforce
># openssl smime -sign -nocerts -noattr -binary -in no_sig_enforce \
>    -inkey <system_trusted_key> -signer <cert> -outform der \
>    -out /sys/kernel/security/modsign/disable_enforce
># cat /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce
>N

I'm not convinced we need this. And neither the use case nor the
motivation is explained in the cover letter :-(

The way I see it - the only time you'd actually use this is in the
situation where you have *already* enabled sig_enforce, and then later
you change your mind - meaning you wanted to load unsigned modules
after all. And if you ever plan on loading unsigned modules, why would
you have enabled sig_enforce in the first place? If you want to keep
the option of loading unsigned modules, don't have sig_enforce or
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE enabled.

[ CC'd Rusty in case he has some thoughts on this ]

Jessica

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-24  2:59 Jia Zhang
2018-03-24  2:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: Do not access sig_enforce directly Jia Zhang
2018-03-24  2:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: Create the entry point initialize_module() Jia Zhang
2018-03-24  2:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: Support to disable validity enforcement in runtime Jia Zhang
2018-03-27 22:11 ` Jessica Yu [this message]
2018-03-28  1:02   ` [PATCH v3 0/3][RESEND] modsign enhancement Jia Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327221137.d7fhboicw2wi3a52@redbean \
    --to=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®