From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Cyrus-Session-Id: sloti22d1t05-2629663-1522250930-2-4522123711196791354 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0 X-Spam-known-sender: no X-Spam-score: 0.0 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_00 -1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01, LANGUAGES en, BAYES_USED global, SA_VERSION 3.4.0 X-Spam-source: IP='209.132.180.67', Host='vger.kernel.org', Country='CN', FromHeader='org', MailFrom='org' X-Spam-charsets: plain='us-ascii' X-Resolved-to: greg@kroah.com X-Delivered-to: greg@kroah.com X-Mail-from: linux-api-owner@vger.kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=messagingengine.com; s=arctest; t=1522250929; b=r4lfdxkWsoVl3hd7PNpR8PPIuTWuMaKh9TOtCaU7cev8Naw 9R98ncbAAwwY5AAIBSnJFwqlzI3ImC4sGx3DpHof3mPAkt0/L63E82QOTrSRHPpA bogiYQbPk6IXm0ioQU2D8xoWLQk3x+94b0DIJwTwJCHcupoQ+omLW2e/dPBVO6C+ gAofonLRfs4zX9za+LUspS0XCFPfEsPnng0jFOunYrNUXTF8BLPlntknn23d7uhA wwb1USCI6SDm/kYtax1cjJWxei2GkkqgIJE8jfVUhJnXXTadqIcZcu1zTctIMhMV hnpV2dGx6Y0X7qYJwkqpBTNlFJNhoQyU0TfYqBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to:sender :list-id; s=arctest; t=1522250929; bh=0DBJd2aIn2axDISG+dISq1tRxh 1Lh/d8T7ey4pkLW0Y=; b=Ge08uccF55O1VDoZgIy63uRrcdrniLSXUJnqKb34O2 wiR6MEv5D3kTUCQgmq1GHbUXt5oaXLTHaz0rJa0lXZu973TQEixlicJOdH7uNYOo pj/tePfckL/ZUY+iODh7WVDUT/oN+KO0gr2NZ35EUsCgdDX1KzGRW1nNingG+ZDH LPfLbdM61mjIWj65S6PKmzJYRu5Z7nwN11D+c9Iiy5wyJx7jmmFwhFX1CLTxfkNz zd55VfEi2oaBHM5kJ6f1k8glMbLBxSUO6bOSlVBjHkJtSrJrLZ2vRNW8wPozNcoy h3JWUOrIRb6FeTra0F1m/SAlsgW00lULqMublfl6AOuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx6.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=fail (message has been altered, 2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=YvPO3PM2 x-bits=2048 x-keytype=rsa x-algorithm=sha256 x-selector=merlin.20170209; dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=infradead.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-api-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=infradead.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 Authentication-Results: mx6.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=fail (message has been altered, 2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=YvPO3PM2 x-bits=2048 x-keytype=rsa x-algorithm=sha256 x-selector=merlin.20170209; dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=infradead.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-api-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=infradead.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean X-CM-Envelope: MS4wfJ7CVGKHTYMi+HXCXfGhmLjO/pyhaDMzOXyB/fmKdkHSVu2RMZWR5KSXMQE2FM5ejq4DJIpZ6bLgBt7DHyaxJcAmihaR2Uevakj7VYhFQanqemo0R6q6 I4fTKJx/Pgi8NiD7TMJtxgXbXFv9KLsHK5dDpLOw9w1sZkszVUZH/crv991X9krYLI2Teh2MFPvGlkVmQ6vad5MCj9gf3K2MBnrcX1C5daisnwjRLNaD4a6X X-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=FKU1Odgs c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:117 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=v2DPQv5-lfwA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=tNHiDg_IQ_6bsilUGuAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=x8gzFH9gYPwA:10 a=AjGcO6oz07-iQ99wixmX:22 X-ME-CMScore: 0 X-ME-CMCategory: none Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753992AbeC1P2l (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:28:41 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:56390 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753511AbeC1P2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:28:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:28:14 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , linux-kernel , linux-api , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Hunter , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.17 02/21] rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call (v12) Message-ID: <20180328152814.GI4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180327160542.28457-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20180327160542.28457-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20180328125004.GV4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1523662633.2105.1522248474778.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180328145946.GH4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <265889560.1.1522250045589.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <265889560.1.1522250045589.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-api-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:14:05AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > If at all possible I would make it SIGSEGV when issueing SYSCALL()s from > > within an RSEQ. > > What's the goal there ? rseq critical sections can technically do system calls > if they wish. Why prevent this ? This all started as a way to do 'small' _fast_ per-cpu ops, System calls do NOT fit in that pattern. If you're willing to do a system calls the cost of atomics is not a problem. > How would you handle signal handlers that issue system calls while nested > on top of a rseq critical section in the userspace thread ? SIGSEGV on > SYSCALLs will break this case. Have the rseq thing aborted prior to delivering the signal ?