mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] softirq: Remove __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:16:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180329071619.GO4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522290425-22844-11-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:27:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The last user of __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING has been converted to generic
> per-cpu softirq mask. We can now remove this conditional.

This seems like half a cleanup; who still has local_softirq_pending()
after this?

>  
>  #else /* local_softirq_pending */
>  
> -#ifndef __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING
>  #define set_softirq_pending(x) (local_softirq_pending() = (x))
>  #define or_softirq_pending(x)  (local_softirq_pending() |= (x))
> -#endif
>  
>  #endif /* local_softirq_pending */

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-29  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-29  2:26 [PATCH 00/10] softirq: Consolidate and optimize softirq mask Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] ia64: Convert local_softirq_pending() to per-cpu ops Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] sparc: Convert local_softirq_pending() to use per-cpu op Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] softirq: Turn default irq_cpustat_t to standard per-cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] softirq: Consolidate default local_softirq_pending() implementations Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] ia64: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] parisc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] powerpc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] sparc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  2:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] softirq: Remove __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29  7:16   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-03-29 13:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29 14:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-29 14:07         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29 14:53           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-03-29 16:55             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-29 18:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-03  5:52               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-04-03  8:42                 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180329071619.GO4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome