mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/9] vsprintf: Consistent %pK handling for kptr_restrict == 0
Date: Wed,  4 Apr 2018 10:58:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180404085843.16050-3-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180404085843.16050-1-pmladek@suse.com>

restricted_pointer() pretends that it prints the address when kptr_restrict
is set to zero. But it is never called in this situation. Instead,
pointer() falls back to ptr_to_id() and hashes the pointer.

This patch removes the potential confusion. klp_restrict is checked only
in restricted_pointer().

It should actually fix a small race when the address might get printed
unhashed:

CPU0                            CPU1

pointer()
  if (!kptr_restrict)
     /* for example set to 2 */
  restricted_pointer()
				/* echo 0 >/proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict */
				proc_dointvec_minmax_sysadmin()
				  klpr_restrict = 0;
    switch(kptr_restrict)
      case 0:
	break:

    number()

Fixes: commit ef0010a30935de4e0211 ("vsprintf: don't use 'restricted_pointer()' when not restricting")
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tobin Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
 lib/vsprintf.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index c0c677c6a833..9ade2c4f21ba 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -637,7 +637,8 @@ static int __init initialize_ptr_random(void)
 early_initcall(initialize_ptr_random);
 
 /* Maps a pointer to a 32 bit unique identifier. */
-static char *ptr_to_id(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, struct printf_spec spec)
+static char *ptr_to_id(char *buf, char *end,
+		       const void *ptr, struct printf_spec spec)
 {
 	unsigned long hashval;
 	const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
@@ -1426,8 +1427,8 @@ char *restricted_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
 
 	switch (kptr_restrict) {
 	case 0:
-		/* Always print %pK values */
-		break;
+		/* Handle as %p, hash and do _not_ leak addresses. */
+		return ptr_to_id(buf, end, ptr, spec);
 	case 1: {
 		const struct cred *cred;
 
@@ -1931,8 +1932,6 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
 			return buf;
 		}
 	case 'K':
-		if (!kptr_restrict)
-			break;
 		return restricted_pointer(buf, end, ptr, spec);
 	case 'N':
 		return netdev_bits(buf, end, ptr, fmt);
-- 
2.13.6

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-04  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-04  8:58 [PATCH v4 0/9] vsprintf: Prevent silent crashes and consolidate error handling Petr Mladek
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] vsprintf: Shuffle ptr_to_id() code Petr Mladek
2018-04-04  8:58 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2018-04-04 23:10   ` [PATCH v4 2/9] vsprintf: Consistent %pK handling for kptr_restrict == 0 Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-05 14:34     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-05 13:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-05 14:46     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-07 14:08       ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-09 12:05         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-09 12:11           ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] vsprintf: Do not check address of well-known strings Petr Mladek
2018-04-05 13:30   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-06  9:15     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-07 14:12       ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-09 12:19         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-10 10:05           ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer specifiers Petr Mladek
2018-04-05 14:25   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-05 23:45     ` Joe Perches
2018-04-05 23:55       ` Joe Perches
2018-04-06 11:43         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 13:17           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-06 14:27             ` Joe Perches
2018-04-09 12:30               ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-07 14:23             ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-06 23:52         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-06 23:59           ` Joe Perches
2018-04-07  0:33             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-07  1:00               ` Joe Perches
2018-04-07  1:17                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-06 11:25     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-07 14:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-09 13:50     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-10 11:41       ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-11  9:52         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-24 16:47           ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr_string() Petr Mladek
2018-04-04 23:58   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-05 14:14     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-07 14:30   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] vsprintf: Factor out %pV handler as va_format() Petr Mladek
2018-04-04 14:26   ` Joe Perches
2018-04-06 13:12     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 14:19       ` Joe Perches
2018-04-09 11:44         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-09 11:59           ` Joe Perches
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] vsprintf: Factor out %pO handler as kobject_string() Petr Mladek
2018-04-04 23:35   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-04 23:43     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-05 14:02     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing invalid pointers Petr Mladek
2018-04-05 14:46   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-06 12:26     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 13:12       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-10 13:26         ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-06  9:37   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-04  8:58 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] vsprintf: Avoid confusion between invalid address and value Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180404085843.16050-3-pmladek@suse.com \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®