From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751773AbeDFTeg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:34:36 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:56388 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751389AbeDFTef (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:34:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 21:34:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Abderrahmane Benbachir Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] init, tracing: Add initcall trace events Message-ID: <20180406193424.GM4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180406190854.875810797@goodmis.org> <20180406151923.292cb09f@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180406151923.292cb09f@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:19:23PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Peter, Andrew, > > This keeps initcall_debug printing printk()s, but adds the feature of > those locations also being trace events. Are you OK if I add this? Yeah, I don't see any real problems with it.