mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@virtuozzo.com>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] livepatch: Atomic replace feature
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:10:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180406221050.y7avkxjt4e23jojc@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180323120028.31451-1-pmladek@suse.com>

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:00:20PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> The atomic replace allows to create cumulative patches. They
> are useful when you maintain many livepatches and want to remove
> one that is lower on the stack. In addition it is very useful when
> more patches touch the same function and there are dependencies
> between them.
> 
> This version is heavily refactored and cleaned based on feedback from Josh.
> There are actually only three functional changes.
> 
> It still passes the first draft of the selfttest from Joe that can
> be found at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1520881024-29386-1-git-send-email-joe.lawrence@redhat.com
> 
> 
> Changes against v10:
> 
>   + Bug fixes and functional changes:
>     + Handle Nops in klp_ftrace_handled() to avoid infinite loop [Mirek]
>     + Really add dynamically allocated klp_object into the list [Petr]
>     + Clear patch->replace when transition finishes [Josh]
> 
>   + Refactoring and clean up [Josh]:
>     + Replace enum types with bools
>     + Avoid using ERR_PTR
>     + Remove too paranoid warnings
>     + Distinguish registered patches by a flag instead of a list
>     + Squash some functions
>     + Update comments, documentation, and commit messages
>     + Squashed and split patches to do more controversial changes later

Thanks again for all the changes.  I think I like the general direction
of the patches now, even some of the later ones ;-)

Along with the minor comments from my other emails, I still have the
question about "does it make sense to enforce a stack anymore".

And of course I would really like to see the selftests in place first.

-- 
Josh

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-06 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-23 12:00 Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] livepatch: Use lists to manage patches, objects and functions Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] livepatch: Free only structures with initialized kobject Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] livepatch: Add atomic replace Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 22:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-09 13:53     ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-10  9:31       ` Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] livepatch: Add an extra flag to distinguish registered patches Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 22:06   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-09 14:02   ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-10 10:56     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-10 17:53       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] livepatch: Remove replaced patches from the stack Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] livepatch: Remove Nop structures when unused Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 22:07   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-10  9:14   ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-10 11:09     ` Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] livepatch: Allow to replace even disabled patches Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 12:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] livepatch: Atomic replace and cumulative patches documentation Petr Mladek
2018-03-23 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/8] livepatch: Atomic replace feature Petr Mladek
2018-04-06 22:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180406221050.y7avkxjt4e23jojc@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=eshatokhin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®