From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753478AbeDIQWn (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:22:43 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36904 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753106AbeDIQWl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:22:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:22:33 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel , linux-s390 , Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 patches for the 4.17 merge window #1 In-Reply-To: References: <20180403111242.49f43ee7@mschwideX1> <20180409151821.2d92303f@mschwideX1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18040916-0020-0000-0000-0000040FCA95 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18040916-0021-0000-0000-000042A3EC1C Message-Id: <20180409182233.5a9150c5@mschwideX1> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-09_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804090169 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:07:12 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Martin Schwidefsky > wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:12:42 +0200 > > Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > >> please pull from the 'for-linus' branch of > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git for-linus > >> > >> to receive the following updates: > > > > Ping. > > > > Did this please-pull get lost or is there a deeper reason that prevents > > the upstream integration? > > I'm not finding the original at all, and this 'ping' message I found > in my spam-box. Maybe the original was marked as spam too and I didn't > notice, and it got deleted with the other spam. Not good, any idea why the ping message has been marked as spam? Maybe there is something in the headers that gives a hint. > Anyway, pulled now (even if this ping didn't have the diffstat and > shortlog to check against - everything looks sane) Thanks. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.