From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, shli@fb.com, nborisov@suse.com, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-cgroup: remove entries in blkg_tree before queue release
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:56:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411145632.GK793541@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180411145123.GJ793541@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Hello, again.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:51:23AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Oh, it wasn't Joseph's change. It was Bart's fix for a problem
> reported by Joseph. Bart, a063057d7c73 ("block: Fix a race between
> request queue removal and the block cgroup controller") created a
> regression where a request_queue can be destroyed with blkgs still
> attached. The original report is..
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180407102148.GA9729@gmail.com
And looking at the change, it looks like the right thing we should
have done is caching @lock on the print_blkg side and when switching
locks make sure both locks are held. IOW, do the following in
blk_cleanup_queue()
spin_lock_irq(lock);
if (q->queue_lock != &q->__queue_lock) {
spin_lock(&q->__queue_lock);
q->queue_lock = &q->__queue_lock;
spin_unlock(&q->__queue_lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq(lock);
Otherwise, there can be two lock holders thinking they have exclusive
access to the request_queue.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-07 10:21 Alexandru Moise
2018-04-09 22:09 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-11 10:12 ` Alexandru Moise
2018-04-11 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-11 14:28 ` Alexandru Moise
2018-04-11 14:46 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-11 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-11 14:56 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-04-11 16:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 17:00 ` tj
2018-04-11 17:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 17:15 ` tj
2018-04-11 17:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 17:30 ` tj
2018-04-11 15:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 19:00 ` Alexandru Moise
2018-04-11 19:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 19:57 ` tj
2018-04-11 20:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 20:02 ` tj
2018-04-11 20:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 21:23 ` Alexandru Moise
2018-04-11 21:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 22:58 ` Alexandru Moise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411145632.GK793541@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=00moses.alexander00@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome