From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754656AbeDPJhw (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:37406 "EHLO mail-pg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753224AbeDPJhu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:37:50 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+wvnAuVM0Go0XYWPFET+kAwD6opNvaDlbj4inf75mp6tiL+fwwcFK6OLYK+uHZbu/UzHW++A== Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:07:47 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Sudeep Holla , edubezval@gmail.com, kevin.wangtao@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, javi.merino@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Amit Daniel Kachhap Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver Message-ID: <20180416093747.GB4244@vireshk-i7> References: <1522945005-7165-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1522945005-7165-7-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <3f3b3b7a-3b74-aee2-2fac-f2759babe3f0@arm.com> <939f7943-feec-aaa2-3bd3-59a6618330c0@linaro.org> <20180416073729.GA4244@vireshk-i7> <0a3164f9-4738-e24e-6ed0-2c75024c304c@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0a3164f9-4738-e24e-6ed0-2c75024c304c@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16-04-18, 09:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Because we rely on the number to identify the cluster and flag it > 'processed'. The number itself is not important. It is, because you are creating multiple groups (like cpufreq policies) right now based on cluster id. Which will be zero for all the CPUs. So in a big little system we will have two cpufreq cooling devices and one cpuidle cooling device. -- viresh