From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] livepatch: Allocate and free shadow variables more safely
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:36:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180416113647.25288-1-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
Nikolai started to use shadow variables and found that list_head
is not initialized correctly using the existing API.
The problem is that LIST_HEAD_INIT() set pointers to itself.
klp_shadow_alloc() then copies these pointers to another location.
It would be possible to solve this by a late initialization. But
this does not work well with klp_shadow_get_or_alloc(). Also this
behavior is error prone. Note that list_head might be hidden in
another structure, for example mutex.
I suggest to change the API and allow to initialize the shadow
variables using a custom callback. I think that we have already
talked about this but we decided to go the easier way. It seems
that it was a bad decision.
I send also patch that add a symmetric callback to the klp_shadow_free()
functions. It might be handy especially for klp_shadow_free_all().
Changes against v2:
+ Use pr_err() instead of WARN() when ctor() fails [Josh]
+ Some typos [Mirek]
Changes against v1:
+ Rename init/free callbacks to ctor/dtor
+ Misc update of comments and commit messages
+ Fix sizeof() in the sample code in shadow-vars.txt
Petr Mladek (2):
livepatch: Initialize shadow variables safely by a custom callback
livepatch: Allow to call a custom callback when freeing shadow
variables
Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.txt | 41 ++++++++----
include/linux/livepatch.h | 19 ++++--
kernel/livepatch/shadow.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c | 43 +++++++++---
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix2.c | 33 ++++-----
5 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 11:36 Petr Mladek [this message]
2018-04-16 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] livepatch: Initialize shadow variables safely by a custom callback Petr Mladek
2018-04-16 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: Allow to call a custom callback when freeing shadow variables Petr Mladek
2018-04-16 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] livepatch: Allocate and free shadow variables more safely Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 11:21 ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-17 11:44 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180416113647.25288-1-pmladek@suse.com \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®