From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong module .text address in 4.16.0
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:43:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180416134309.lt7mrxe5khcuhozl@redbean> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dc648ad-0a6b-ba79-5d6a-fb3e3029994f@de.ibm.com>
+++ Christian Borntraeger [16/04/18 12:53 +0200]:
>Can this be related to
>commit ef0010a30935de4e0211cbc7bdffc30446cdee9b
> vsprintf: don't use 'restricted_pointer()' when not restricting
>and related commits?
>
>To me it looks like %pk is always printing the hash, but never the real pointer -
>no matter what kernel.kptr_restrict says.
(Added Kees and Tobin to CC)
Can confirm, a git bisect confirms that ef0010a3093 was the first bad commit.
And yeah, the default seems to be to always hash the pointer address now,
regardless of kptr_restrict. See Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt:
When kptr_restrict is set to 0 (the default) the address is hashed before
printing. (This is the equivalent to %p.)
And to quote from the relevant patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/28/1593):
The added advantage of hashing %p is that security is now opt-out, if
you _really_ want the address you have to work a little harder and use %px.
So for users of /sys/module/*/sections, we will need to work around
this and possibly use %px for the real address. But perhaps we should
base the usage of %px on kptr_restrict? That is what m_show() in
module.c currently does, which is why you get the correct address when
you look at /proc/modules (it uses %px and either shows 0's or the
real address based on kallsyms_show_value()). module_sect_show() uses
%pK so it's getting hashed. Is there a better way of doing this?
Jessica
>
>
>On 04/16/2018 08:23 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> FWIW, this breaks at least perf capability to resolve module symbols.
>> Adding some more CCs for perf and module.
>>
>>
>> On 04/16/2018 07:51 AM, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
>>> I just installed 4.16.0 and discovered the module .text address is
>>> wrong. It happens on s390 and x86 platforms. I have not tested others.
>>>
>>> Here is the issue, I have used module qeth_l2 on s390 which is the
>>> ethernet device driver:
>>>
>>> root@s35lp76 ~]# lsmod
>>> Module Size Used by
>>> qeth_l2 94208 1
>>> ...
>>>
>>> [root@s35lp76 ~]# cat /proc/modules | egrep '^qeth_l2'
>>> qeth_l2 94208 1 - Live 0x000003ff80401000 <---- This is the correct address in memory
>>> [root@s35lp76 ~]# cat /sys/module/qeth_l2/sections/.text
>>> 0x0000000018ea8363 <---- This is the wrong address
>>> [root@s35lp76 ~]#
>>>
>>> File /sys/module/qeth_l2/sections/.text displays a very strange
>>> address which is definitely wrong. It should be something like
>>> 0x000003ff80401xxx.
>>>
>>> Same on x86.
>>>
>>> I have checked file kernel/module.c function add_sect_attrs()
>>> and it calls module_sect_show() when the sysfs file is read.
>>> And module_sect_show() uses
>>>
>>> sprintf(buf, "0x%pK\n", (void *)sattr->address);
>>>
>>> and my sysctl setting should be correct:
>>> [root@s35lp76 linux]# sysctl -a | fgrep kernel.kptr_restrict
>>> kernel.kptr_restrict = 0
>>> [root@s35lp76 linux]#
>>>
>>> I wonder if somebody else has seen this issue?
>>> Ideas how to fix this?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 5:51 Thomas-Mich Richter
2018-04-16 6:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-16 10:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-16 13:43 ` Jessica Yu [this message]
2018-04-16 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-16 11:41 ` Thomas-Mich Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180416134309.lt7mrxe5khcuhozl@redbean \
--to=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®