From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755293AbeDQQkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:40:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56794 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755118AbeDQQkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:40:22 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C2BBB21838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:40:19 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle new x86 syscall func names Message-ID: <20180417124019.1e4350d5@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180417163527.GA7775@kernel.org> References: <20180417115440.2145f7f5@gandalf.local.home> <20180417163527.GA7775@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:35:27 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > [root@jouet ~]# perf test openat > 2: Detect openat syscall event : Ok > 3: Detect openat syscall event on all cpus : Ok > 15: syscalls:sys_enter_openat event fields : Ok > [root@jouet ~]# > > [root@jouet ~]# perf trace -e nanosleep,syscalls:*nanosleep sleep 1 > 0.000 ( ): syscalls:sys_enter_nanosleep:rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950, rmtp: 0x00000000 > 0.009 ( ): sleep/7905 nanosleep(rqtp: 0x7ffd9f737950 ) ... > 1000.204 ( ): syscalls:sys_exit_nanosleep:0x0 > 0.009 (1000.217 ms): sleep/7905 ... [continued]: nanosleep()) = 0 > [root@jouet ~]# > > Works, so the regression seems to be fixed, without looking at the code > that much: > > Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo But does this still work on x86_32? I'll test that out. Thanks for testing, but I may have another patch soon. -- Steve