From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: fix bad use of igrab in kernel/event/core.c
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:17:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419061710.l6sdq3kvricpyjdu@um.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180418062907.3210386-2-songliubraving@fb.com>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:29:07PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> As Miklos reported and suggested:
>
> This pattern repeats two times in trace_uprobe.c and in
> kernel/events/core.c as well:
>
> ret = kern_path(filename, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_address_parse;
>
> inode = igrab(d_inode(path.dentry));
> path_put(&path);
>
> And it's wrong. You can only hold a reference to the inode if you
> have an active ref to the superblock as well (which is normally
> through path.mnt) or holding s_umount.
Oops. I must have snatched it from the uprobe code without thinking.
> This way unmounting the containing filesystem while the tracepoint is
> active will give you the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount..." message
> and a crash when the inode is finally put.
>
> Solution: store path instead of inode.
>
> This patch fixes the issue in kernel/event/core.c.
>
> NOTE: Based on my understanding, perf_addr_filter only supports intel_pt.
Coresight too, but that's probably even further away from what you have.
> However, my test system doesn't support address filtering (or I made a
> mistake?). Therefore, I have NOT tested this patch.
Check /sys/devices/intel_pt/caps/num_address_ranges, if it's non-zero,
it's supported.
> Could someone please help test it?
Yes:
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
The subject line needs a little love to be more like other perf commits, but
other than that, looks good.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-18 6:29 [PATCH 1/2] tracing: fix bad use of igrab in trace_uprobe.c Song Liu
2018-04-18 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: fix bad use of igrab in kernel/event/core.c Song Liu
2018-04-19 6:17 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2018-05-22 21:56 ` Song Liu
2018-05-23 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Fix bad use of igrab() tip-bot for Song Liu
2018-04-18 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: fix bad use of igrab in trace_uprobe.c Miklos Szeredi
2018-04-18 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-18 14:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-04-18 15:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-18 16:15 ` Song Liu
2018-04-18 16:08 ` Song Liu
2018-04-18 16:25 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180419061710.l6sdq3kvricpyjdu@um.fi.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®