mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: handle errors on ext4_commit_super
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:58:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419155818.GA81439@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419151853.jtif7ncjuhf6yuwl@quack2.suse.cz>

Hi Jan,

Thank you for the review.

On 04/19, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 29-03-18 18:44:29, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>
> > 
> > When remounting ext4 from ro to rw, currently it allows its transition,
> > even if ext4_commit_super() returns EIO. Even worse thing is, after that,
> > fs/buffer complains buffer dirty bits like:
> > 
> >  Call trace:
> >  [<ffffff9750c259dc>] mark_buffer_dirty+0x184/0x1a4
> >  [<ffffff9750cb398c>] __ext4_handle_dirty_super+0x4c/0xfc
> >  [<ffffff9750c7a9fc>] ext4_file_open+0x154/0x1c0
> >  [<ffffff9750bea51c>] do_dentry_open+0x114/0x2d0
> >  [<ffffff9750bea75c>] vfs_open+0x5c/0x94
> >  [<ffffff9750bf879c>] path_openat+0x668/0xfe8
> >  [<ffffff9750bf8088>] do_filp_open+0x74/0x120
> >  [<ffffff9750beac98>] do_sys_open+0x148/0x254
> >  [<ffffff9750beade0>] SyS_openat+0x10/0x18
> >  [<ffffff9750a83ab0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
> >  EXT4-fs (dm-1): previous I/O error to superblock detected
> >  Buffer I/O error on dev dm-1, logical block 0, lost sync page write
> >  EXT4-fs (dm-1): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
> >  Buffer I/O error on dev dm-1, logical block 80, lost async page write
> > 
> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> > Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
> > Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/ext4/super.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks for the patch. Some comments below.
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 39bf464c35f1..b268bfea879c 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ static int ext4_setup_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_super_block *es,
> >  	if (sbi->s_journal)
> >  		ext4_set_feature_journal_needs_recovery(sb);
> >  
> > -	ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> > +	res = ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> >  done:
> >  	if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
> >  		printk(KERN_INFO "[EXT4 FS bs=%lu, gc=%u, "
> 
> So return value of ext4_setup_super() looks a bit strange and it seems it
> currently returns 0 or SB_RDONLY. So I think you first need to clean this

Indeed. I'll update it in v2.

> up before making ext4_setup_super() return error code (as your patch could
> make ext4_fill_super() return SB_RDONLY under some circumstances).

Interestingly, it only affects ext4_remount() only. :P

> 
> > @@ -4739,11 +4739,10 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
> >  		unlock_buffer(sbh);
> >  		error = __sync_dirty_buffer(sbh,
> >  			REQ_SYNC | (test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? REQ_FUA : 0));
> > -		if (error)
> > +		if (error && !buffer_write_io_error(sbh))
> >  			return error;
> >  
> > -		error = buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
> > -		if (error) {
> > +		if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
> >  			ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "I/O error while writing "
> >  			       "superblock");
> >  			clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
> 
> I'd rather rewrite this as:
> 		if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
> 			do stuff as now
> 		}
> 		if (error)
> 			return error;

Got it.

Thanks,

> 
> 								Honza
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-19 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-30  1:44 Jaegeuk Kim
2018-04-19 15:18 ` Jan Kara
2018-04-19 15:58   ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2018-04-19 15:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-04-21 13:12   ` Jan Kara
2018-04-23 14:46   ` [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-05-14  3:46     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180419155818.GA81439@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaegeuk@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®