From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Philipp Klocke <Phil_K97@gmx.de>
Cc: sil2review@lists.osadl.org, kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org,
llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
der.herr@hofr.at, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Change sched_feat(x) in !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG case
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420075717.GB4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180416085426.24157-1-Phil_K97@gmx.de>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Philipp Klocke wrote:
> This patch is motivated by the clang warning Wconstant-logical-operand,
> issued when logically comparing a variable to a constant integer that is
> neither 1 nor 0. It happens for sched_feat(x) when sysctl_sched_features
> is constant, i.e., CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is not set.
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c:3927:14: warning: use of logical '&&' with constant operand [-Wconstant-logical-operand]
> if (initial && sched_feat(START_DEBIT))
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/sched/fair.c:3927:14: note: use '&' for a bitwise operation
> if (initial && sched_feat(START_DEBIT))
> ^~
> &
> kernel/sched/fair.c:3927:14: note: remove constant to silence this warning
> if (initial && sched_feat(START_DEBIT))
> ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> @@ -1305,7 +1305,11 @@ static const_debug __maybe_unused unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
> 0;
> #undef SCHED_FEAT
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> #define sched_feat(x) (sysctl_sched_features & (1UL << __SCHED_FEAT_##x))
> +#else
> +#define sched_feat(x) ((sysctl_sched_features >> __SCHED_FEAT_##x) & 1UL)
> +#endif
So this is extra ugly, for no gain?
WTH does clang complain about a constant? Can't you just disable that
stupid warning?
Also, if sysctl_sched_features is a constant, the both expressions
_should_ really result in a constant and clang should still warn about
it.
I'm really not seeing why we'd want to do this. Just fix clang to not be
stupid.
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 8:54 Philipp Klocke
2018-04-18 13:49 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2018-04-20 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-04-20 16:29 ` Philipp Klocke
2018-04-20 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 21:29 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2018-04-23 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180420075717.GB4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Phil_K97@gmx.de \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sil2review@lists.osadl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®