From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:26:35 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Matthew Wilcox , LKML , Philippe Ombredanne , Kate Stewart Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] LICENSES: Add CC-BY-SA-4.0 license text Message-ID: <20180423082635.GB20868@kroah.com> References: <20180422220208.772527041@linutronix.de> <20180422220833.423253901@linutronix.de> <20180423065449.GE4208@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:37:14AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Add the full text of the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to the kernel tree. It was > > > copied directly from: > > > > > > https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.html#licenseText > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > > > As we only have 1 user of this, do we really need it? > > > > Willy, it's your file, Documentation/core-api/idr.rst that is needing > > this addition to the LICENSES directory. While I'm all for CC licenses > > for Documentation, we don't seem to be very consistent with them. > > Should this be the "default" license we choose for documentation for now > > on? > > I'm all for it. If we can agree than this should move to preferred/ and not > to other/ Ok, that sounds good, Jon? I know you have looked into picking a decent license for documentation, any thoughts here? thanks, greg k-h