From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752733AbeDXTde (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:33:34 -0400 Received: from bert.emutex.com ([91.103.1.109]:54589 "EHLO bert.emutex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750735AbeDXTdb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:33:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 20:33:04 +0100 From: Javier Arteaga To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , "Dan O'Donovan" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc128s052: allow driver to be matched using ACPI Message-ID: <20180424193304.yitnosi3vwirqlu7@localhost> References: <20180419132036.27493-1-javier@emutex.com> <20180419132036.27493-2-javier@emutex.com> <20180421165441.0c64415d@archlinux> <20180421204157.y3zoejow7gfl3pj3@localhost> <20180424182330.000061a5@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180424182330.000061a5@huawei.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "statler.emutex.com", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Unless we know of ACPI firmwares out there that are doing this, drop the > patch for now. I don't want to see a flood of these based on a 'you can > do it that' way argument. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Unless we know of ACPI firmwares out there that are doing this, drop the > patch for now. I don't want to see a flood of these based on a 'you can > do it that' way argument. Fair enough. I'll drop it for v3.