From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 15:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180501131904.GG12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <745d762d-9ab3-0749-9b87-9bb03d913071@codeaurora.org>
> On 5/1/2018 5:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Let me ponder what the best solution is, it's a bit of a mess.
So there's:
- TASK_PARKED, which we can make a special state; this solves the
problem because then wait_task_inactive() is guaranteed to see
TASK_PARKED and DTRT.
- complete(&kthread->parked), which we can do inside schedule(); this
solves the problem because then kthread_park() will not return early
and the task really is blocked.
and I'm fairly sure I thought of a 3rd way to cure things, but now that
I'm writing things down I cannot seem to remember :/ -- could be we muck
with wait_task_inactive().
In any case, I hate all of them, but I think the completion one is the
least horrible because it gives the strongest guarantees and cleans up
most. But promoting TASK_PARKED to special certainly is the earier
patch.
The below boots, but that's about all I did with it. Opinions?
---
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k);
void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *k);
void kthread_parkme(void);
+void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k);
int kthreadd(void *unused);
extern struct task_struct *kthreadd_task;
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU = 0,
KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP,
KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK,
- KTHREAD_IS_PARKED,
};
static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
@@ -177,14 +176,12 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self)
{
- __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
- while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) {
- if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags))
- complete(&self->parked);
+ for (;;) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
+ if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags))
+ break;
schedule();
- __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
}
- clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
}
@@ -194,6 +191,11 @@ void kthread_parkme(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_parkme);
+void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k)
+{
+ complete(&to_kthread(k)->parked);
+}
+
static int kthread(void *_create)
{
/* Copy data: it's on kthread's stack */
@@ -450,22 +452,15 @@ void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *
{
struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
- clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
/*
- * We clear the IS_PARKED bit here as we don't wait
- * until the task has left the park code. So if we'd
- * park before that happens we'd see the IS_PARKED bit
- * which might be about to be cleared.
+ * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
+ * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
*/
- if (test_and_clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
- /*
- * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
- * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
- */
- if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
- __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
- wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
- }
+ if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
+ __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
+
+ clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+ wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_unpark);
@@ -488,12 +483,13 @@ int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k)
if (WARN_ON(k->flags & PF_EXITING))
return -ENOSYS;
- if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
- set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
- if (k != current) {
- wake_up_process(k);
- wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
- }
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags)))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+ if (k != current) {
+ wake_up_process(k);
+ wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
}
return 0;
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
*/
#include "sched.h"
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+
#include <asm/switch_to.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
@@ -2718,20 +2720,28 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(str
membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(mm);
mmdrop(mm);
}
- if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
- if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
- prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
+ if (unlikely(prev_state & (TASK_DEAD|TASK_PARKED))) {
+ switch (prev_state) {
+ case TASK_DEAD:
+ if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
+ prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
+
+ /*
+ * Remove function-return probe instances associated with this
+ * task and put them back on the free list.
+ */
+ kprobe_flush_task(prev);
- /*
- * Remove function-return probe instances associated with this
- * task and put them back on the free list.
- */
- kprobe_flush_task(prev);
+ /* Task is done with its stack. */
+ put_task_stack(prev);
- /* Task is done with its stack. */
- put_task_stack(prev);
+ put_task_struct(prev);
+ break;
- put_task_struct(prev);
+ case TASK_PARKED:
+ kthread_park_complete(prev);
+ break;
+ }
}
tick_nohz_task_switch();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 8:33 Gaurav Kohli
2018-04-25 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 4:04 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-26 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 15:53 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-30 11:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 7:50 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 11:46 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-02 5:15 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-02 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 10:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:09 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:23 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 11:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 15:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 18:21 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-06 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-07 8:30 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 16:02 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-30 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-30 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-28 6:43 ` [lkp-robot] [kthread/smpboot] cad8e99675: inconsistent{IN-HARDIRQ-W}->{HARDIRQ-ON-W}usage kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180501131904.GG12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome