From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751533AbeECNVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 09:21:07 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41664 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970AbeECNVB (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 09:21:01 -0400 From: Mark Rutland To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, catalin.marinas@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, awallis@codeaurora.org Subject: [PATCHv4 08/10] arm64: perf: strip PAC when unwinding userspace Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 14:20:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20180503132031.25705-9-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20180503132031.25705-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20180503132031.25705-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When the kernel is unwinding userspace callchains, we can't expect that the userspace consumer of these callchains has the data necessary to strip the PAC from the stored LR. This patch has the kernel strip the PAC from user stackframes when the in-kernel unwinder is used. This only affects the LR value, and not the FP. This only affects the in-kernel unwinder. When userspace performs unwinding, it is up to userspace to strip PACs as necessary (which can be determined from DWARF information). Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan Cc: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h | 7 +++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h index 0263b87f95f7..284db173ae5d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h @@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ static inline void ptrauth_keys_dup(struct ptrauth_keys *old, */ #define ptrauth_pac_mask() GENMASK(54, VA_BITS) +/* Only valid for EL0 TTBR0 instruction pointers */ +static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr) +{ + return ptr & ~ptrauth_pac_mask(); +} + #define mm_ctx_ptrauth_init(ctx) \ ptrauth_keys_init(&(ctx)->ptrauth_keys) @@ -75,6 +81,7 @@ static inline void ptrauth_keys_dup(struct ptrauth_keys *old, ptrauth_keys_dup(&(oldctx)->ptrauth_keys, &(newctx)->ptrauth_keys) #else +#define ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr) (lr) #define mm_ctx_ptrauth_init(ctx) #define mm_ctx_ptrauth_switch(ctx) #define mm_ctx_ptrauth_dup(oldctx, newctx) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c index bcafd7dcfe8b..928204f6ab08 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail, { struct frame_tail buftail; unsigned long err; + unsigned long lr; /* Also check accessibility of one struct frame_tail beyond */ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, tail, sizeof(buftail))) @@ -47,7 +48,9 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail, if (err) return NULL; - perf_callchain_store(entry, buftail.lr); + lr = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(buftail.lr); + + perf_callchain_store(entry, lr); /* * Frame pointers should strictly progress back up the stack -- 2.11.0