From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751419AbeEDLk1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 07:40:27 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52556 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbeEDLk0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 07:40:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 13:40:23 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Punit Agrawal Cc: Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce helpers to manupulate page table entries Message-ID: <20180504114023.GF10191@C02W217FHV2R.local> References: <20180501102659.13188-1-punit.agrawal@arm.com> <20180501102659.13188-3-punit.agrawal@arm.com> <3eab5997-30b2-c51a-ca8e-5545bbadffc0@arm.com> <871sevr0n8.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871sevr0n8.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:00:43PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Hi Suzuki, > > Thanks for having a look. > > Suzuki K Poulose writes: > > > On 01/05/18 11:26, Punit Agrawal wrote: > >> Introduce helpers to abstract architectural handling of the conversion > >> of pfn to page table entries and marking a PMD page table entry as a > >> block entry. > >> > >> The helpers are introduced in preparation for supporting PUD hugepages > >> at stage 2 - which are supported on arm64 but do not exist on arm. > > > > Punit, > > > > The change are fine by me. However, we usually do not define kvm_* > > accessors for something which we know matches with the host variant. > > i.e, PMD and PTE helpers, which are always present and we make use > > of them directly. (see unmap_stage2_pmds for e.g) > > In general, I agree - it makes sense to avoid duplication. > > Having said that, the helpers here allow following a common pattern for > handling the various page sizes - pte, pmd and pud - during stage 2 > fault handling (see patch 4). > > As you've said you're OK with this change, I'd prefer to keep this patch > but will drop it if any others reviewers are concerned about the > duplication as well. There are arguments for both keeping the kvm_ wrappers and not having them. I see no big harm or increase in complexity by keeping them though. Thanks, -Christoffer