mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer causes stack going in wrong direction warnings
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 18:49:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180506234935.yq6zxjetlpldpzz7@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505182912.llj7jb3v7yd43t5h@treble>

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 11:38:16AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2018, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > 
> > > The 'nmi_restore' warning points to a bug in my patch, but the others
> > > are head scratchers.  Here's a patch which combines the first two
> > > patches, plus improves the existing warnings a bit.  Can you try it?
> > 
> > with that updated patch I hit
> > 
> > May  4 21:51:20 haswell kernel: [19245.450607] WARNING: stack recursion on stack type 2
> > May  4 22:21:29 haswell kernel: [21055.268717] WARNING: can't dereference registers at 000000006546ba71 for ip ret_from_intr+0x6/0x1d
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.106762] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0xe/0x90
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.115377] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0xe/0x90
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.124086] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0xd/0x90
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.124088] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x12/0x4a0
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.124097] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0xe/0x90
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.150189] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0xe/0x90
> > May  4 22:36:22 haswell kernel: [21948.150199] WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=intel_pmu_handle_irq+0xe/0x4a0
> > 
> > the last bit repeated for a few minutes (flooding the log with a few 
> > thousand entries that look mostly similar)
> 
> Thanks.  I can recreate now, so I'll stop bugging you for a bit.  This
> fuzzer is really good at finding unwinder issues.

Deja vu.  Most of these are related to perf PEBS, similar to the
following issue:

  b8000586c90b ("perf/x86/intel: Cure bogus unwind from PEBS entries")

This is basically the ORC version of that.  setup_pebs_sample_data() is
assembling a franken-pt_regs which ORC isn't happy about.  RIP is
inconsistent with some of the other registers (like RSP and RBP).

Peter, any ideas?

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-06 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-08 16:12 perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7 Vince Weaver
2018-01-08 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-08 20:29   ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-09 10:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 13:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 13:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 13:44         ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-09 15:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 15:24             ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-09 15:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 15:56                 ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-09 16:05                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 17:07                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11  5:25                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11 19:00                         ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 19:21                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11 19:50                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 19:57                               ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 20:43                                 ` Vince Weaver
2018-05-01 13:29                             ` perf: fuzzer causes stack going in wrong direction warnings Vince Weaver
2018-05-01 13:58                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-01 19:59                                 ` Vince Weaver
2018-05-01 22:04                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-02 20:50                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-04 14:35                                       ` Vince Weaver
2018-05-04 16:25                                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-04 17:00                                           ` Vince Weaver
2018-05-05 15:38                                           ` Vince Weaver
2018-05-05 18:29                                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-06 23:49                                               ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-05-10 13:48                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-10 14:27                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-10 23:16                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-09 16:16                 ` perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7 Ingo Molnar
2018-01-09 16:20                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 17:18                 ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-10 15:28                   ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-09 16:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 17:53               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-09 18:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 18:09                   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-09 19:53                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11  9:13           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 15:26             ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 15:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 16:41                 ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 16:58                   ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 17:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 18:04                       ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 18:20                         ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 19:01                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 19:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 20:15                         ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 20:40                           ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 20:57                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-12 19:48                               ` Vince Weaver
2018-01-11 20:42                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-11 15:29             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180506234935.yq6zxjetlpldpzz7@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®