From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 19:20:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180512022032.GA194946@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
rcu_seq_snap may be tricky for someone looking at it for the first time.
Lets document how it works with an example to make it easier.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
v2 changes: Corrections as suggested by Randy.
kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 003671825d62..533bc1087371 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -91,7 +91,29 @@ static inline void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
WRITE_ONCE(*sp, rcu_seq_endval(sp));
}
-/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
+/*
+ * Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number.
+ *
+ * This function predicts what the grace period number will be the next
+ * time an RCU callback will be executed, given the current grace period's
+ * number. This can be gp+1 if RCU is idle, or gp+2 if a grace period is
+ * already in progress.
+ *
+ * We do this with a single addition and masking.
+ * For example, if RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK=1 and the least significant bit (LSB) of
+ * the seq is used to track if a GP is in progress or not, its sufficient if we
+ * add (2+1) and mask with ~1. Lets see why with an example:
+ *
+ * Say the current seq is 6 which is 0b110 (gp is 3 and state bit is 0).
+ * To get the next GP number, we have to at least add 0b10 to this (0x1 << 1)
+ * to account for the state bit. However, if the current seq is 7 (gp is 3 and
+ * state bit is 1), then it means the current grace period is already in
+ * progress so the next time the callback will run is at the end of grace
+ * period number gp+2. To account for the extra +1, we just overflow the LSB by
+ * adding another 0x1 and masking with ~0x1. In case no GP was in progress (RCU
+ * is idle), then the addition of the extra 0x1 and masking will have no
+ * effect. This is calculated as below.
+ */
static inline unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
{
unsigned long s;
--
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-12 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-12 2:20 Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2018-05-12 2:38 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180512022032.GA194946@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®