From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tgraf@suug.ch, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: reorder some inititalization sequences
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:13:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514151332.31352-1-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
rhashtable_init() allocates memory at the very end of the
call, once everything is setup; with the exception of the
nelems parameter. However, unless the user is doing something
bogus with params for which -EINVAL is returned, memory
allocation is the only operation that can trigger the call
to fail.
Thus move bucket_table_alloc() up such that we fail back to
the caller asap, instead of doing useless checks. This is
safe as the the table allocation isn't using the halfly
setup 'ht' structure and bucket_table_alloc() call chain only
ends up using the ht->nulls_base member in INIT_RHT_NULLS_HEAD.
Also move the locking initialization down to the end.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
lib/rhashtable.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index 9427b5766134..68aadd6bff60 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -1022,8 +1022,6 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht,
struct bucket_table *tbl;
size_t size;
- size = HASH_DEFAULT_SIZE;
-
if ((!params->key_len && !params->obj_hashfn) ||
(params->obj_hashfn && !params->obj_cmpfn))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1032,10 +1030,17 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht,
return -EINVAL;
memset(ht, 0, sizeof(*ht));
- mutex_init(&ht->mutex);
- spin_lock_init(&ht->lock);
memcpy(&ht->p, params, sizeof(*params));
+ if (!params->nelem_hint)
+ size = HASH_DEFAULT_SIZE;
+ else
+ size = rounded_hashtable_size(&ht->p);
+
+ tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (tbl == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
if (params->min_size)
ht->p.min_size = roundup_pow_of_two(params->min_size);
@@ -1050,9 +1055,6 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht,
ht->p.min_size = max_t(u16, ht->p.min_size, HASH_MIN_SIZE);
- if (params->nelem_hint)
- size = rounded_hashtable_size(&ht->p);
-
if (params->locks_mul)
ht->p.locks_mul = roundup_pow_of_two(params->locks_mul);
else
@@ -1068,10 +1070,8 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht,
}
}
- tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (tbl == NULL)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
+ mutex_init(&ht->mutex);
+ spin_lock_init(&ht->lock);
atomic_set(&ht->nelems, 0);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(ht->tbl, tbl);
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 15:13 Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2018-05-15 2:52 ` David Miller
2018-05-15 3:37 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514151332.31352-1-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®